Lowland Neutral Grassland - Cotswold Water Park
LBAP Home Habitats Common themes

Exmoor

Cotswold WP

Taunton

Neutral Grasslan

none

Cotswold Water Park Action Plan
Key factors

Extent/Distribution

The Cotswold Water Park contains at least 55 ha of species-rich unimproved neutral grassland of which 6 are SSSIs. These include Pike Corner, Elmlea Meadows,Whelford Meadows, Wildmoorway Meadow, Upper Waterhay Meadow and Long Meadow. Note that SSSIs are privately owned and access is not necessarily permitted. Part of the candidate Special Area of Conservation (SAC) designated species rich grasslands of Clattinger Farm falls within the Cotswold Water Park and the candidate SAC and National Nature Reserve of North Meadow borders the park. The hydrological impacts of gravel extraction could affect these reserves and therefore the Cotswold Water Park Biodiversity Action Plan also refers to them.

The area of wet grassland in the Cotswold Water Park is unknown but probably small. There is the potential to create this habitat however through gravel pit restoration. In presently occurs around some lake boundaries.

Threats

Hydrology.

Studies are in progress to determine if the pumping of gravel workings for mineral extraction may affect nearby meadows depressing water table and changing sensitive vegetation types. There is no evidence of this at present.

Restoration of pits as open water may also affect ground water levels or alter patterns of surface water flow. One possible mechanism for this could be increased evaporation. Increased water levels may also adversely affect grassland vegetation and alter management practices such as hay cutting.

Recent work by Silsoe College at North Meadow has demonstrated the critical importance of river water levels in maintaining ground water conditions and vegetation at North Meadow. River engineering and management is therefore a critical factor in maintaining neutral grassland interest.

Development and recreation

Direct loss of neutral grassland SSSIs to development is not likely to be a factor in the Water Park. Loss of sites that are not known or evaluated is more likely to be a risk, however, it is unlikely that there are significant areas of high quality neutral grassland remaining that have not been identified. Indirect effects of development or of increasing recreation is more likely to have an impact on grasslands.

Creation of new grasslands

Possibilities for the creation of new wet grasslands exist in the CWP. These could be created as part of agricultural restoration of gravel pits by establishing an appropriate water level or on areas adjoining watercourses. Such grasslands need not be botanically rich to benefit waders, but need to be significant in area (greater than 5 ha).

MAFF have indicated that they would find restoration to wet grassland as more acceptable than open water on best and most versatile agricultural land (grade 3a and above). Such a restoration would conserve the agricultural capacity and increase biodiversity.

Opportunities to create extensive wet grassland may be found in several of the new areas of search. Land north of the Thames close to Latton and between the the River Coln and Dudgrove Lane could be a high priority for wet grassland creation. An additional benefit would be enhancement of the river corridor contributing to the conservation of otter and water vole.

Creation of botanically rich grassland might also be considered in some areas close to or between existing neutral grassland sites. The high cost and uncertain success associated with creating such grasslands require careful targeting to ensure results.

Restoration of Thames and Severn Canal.


Wildmoorway wet meadow SSSI abuts the Severn and Thames canal tow path east of South Cerney. The site may be affected by engineering works associated with the restoration of the canal.

Action Plan Objectives

1) Maintain the area of unimproved neutral grassland and the quality of the characteristic plant communities and associated species. Target date: ongoing

Rationale - This is a rare habitat important to the conservation of many species of conservation concern.



2) Create sufficient lowland wet grassland to achieve national importance for breeding and wintering birds of lowland wet grasslands by 2010, (suitable areas include the River Thames corridor in the Central Section and the River Coln corridor in the East side. Target date 2020)

Rationale - The Water Park has the potential to make a nationally important contribution to the creation of this habitat. RSPB scientific opinion suggests that 200 ha would be adequate to obtain this. Such a site would also have benefits for other species, for example, foraging bats.


 


Action Plan Targets

see above



Current Action

no information currently available


Proposed Action

Policy and legislation

Policy and Legislative

Develop agreed targeting strategy (particularly with MAFF) for incentives to support grassland interest.

LEAD: EN
PARTNERS: MAFF
TARGET: 1999


Seek MAFF's support for the creation of wet grassland with low intensity livestock farming , as a possible option for agricultural restoration on best and most versatile land.

LEAD: EN
PARTNERS: MAFF
TARGET: 1999




Planning Framework


Require planning applications likely to affect surface or ground water close to unimproved grasslands to assess the effect and take measures to prevent adverse impacts.

LEAD:local planning depts
PARTNERS: mineral operators
TARGET: ongoing



Habitat Creation

Consider establishing a demonstration site for wet grassland creation on restored mineral working

LEAD:NCF
PARTNERS: WWT
TARGET: 2010

Management

Site Management

Maintain and where necessary encourage restoration of positive nature conservation management on all neutral grassland SSSI and SNCI sites.

LEAD:EN
PARTNERS:The Wildlife Trusts
TARGET: ongoing


Ensure all SSSI managers receive Site Management Statements (ongoing) identifying nature conservation features and management objectives.

LEAD:EN
TARGET: Ongoing


Protect grassland sites within and close to the Cotswold Water Park from adverse hydrological change (ground water and surface water), particularly in North Meadow, Cricklade and Clattinger Farm.


LEAD: EN
PARTNERS: EA
TARGET: ongoing



Require baseline and ongoing management of groundwater levels in respect of mineral extraction proposals and incorporate mitigation procedures into planning and other consents where appropriate.

LEAD: EA
PARTNERS: mineral planning authorities
TARGET: ongoing


Monitor effectiveness of water table management where this is adopted as a way of managing the effect of gravel working as at Upper Waterhay Meadow.


LEAD: minerals operators
PARTNERS: EA mineral planning authorities
TARGET: ongoing


Protect from development and increases in recreational pressure likely to damage the grassland interest.

LEAD:EN
PARTNERS: The Wildlife Trusts
TARGET: ongoing


Encourage a standard of path and visitor management that minimises impact on the conservation and management of sites.

LEAD: CWP Ranger Service
PARTNERS: The Wildlife Trusts EN
TARGET: 1999


Advisory

Provide advice to mineral operators and land owners on restoration of gravel pits to wet grassland.

LEAD: NCF
PARTNERS: CWP Ranger Service
TARGET: ongoing


Research and monitoring

Research and Monitoring

Assess the need to identify any unimproved grassland sites not yet documented.
LEAD:NCF
TARGET: 1997

Continue to analyse the EN & gravel pit dipwell data to identify trends in groundwater change.
LEAD:EA
TARGET: 1998



Education and awareness raising

none



Progress

no information currently available