Coastal Floodplain & Grazing Marsh- SW
LBAP Home Habitats Common themes

Devon

Dorset

North Somerset

Sedgemoor

       
Key factors
 SW Resource Breakdown:2

County SW Resource
Avon no info
Cornwall no info
Devon no info
Dorset no info
Glouc. no info
Somerset no info
Wilts. no info

1Action for biodiversity
in the South West (1997)

2SW Biodiversity Audit (1996)


Current Status in the SW

Definition1

Seasonally waterlogged grassland which forms part of a wetland system; including lowland wet grassland and floodplain meadows which may be agriculturally improved or unimproved. Grazing Marsh occurs in inland and coastal situations, although this plan excludes salt marshes which are covered in the estuaries HAP.


Current Extent1

Nationally the exact extent of this habitat is not known but it is estimated that there may be 300,000 ha. The South West total of c76,339 ha represents about 25% of the national total. This is a maximum estimate.

A review of all the sites >50 ha in the South West revealed that only 25% of the area consisted of regularly flooded unimproved grassland of existing conservation interest. This amounts to approximately 22,000 ha for the region. An accurate figure of the area of botanically rich grassland is not available. However, in the Somerset Levels and Moors ESA, out of 23,695 ha of grassland, only 1,686 ha of traditional grassland remains i.e. grassland with >40 higher plant species within each field (ADAS pers. comm.)

Examples of important sites in the South West1

  • Severn Vale (North Somerset)
  • Exminster Marshes (Devon)
  • Frome & Stour Valleys (Dorset)
  • Avon Valley (Dorset/Wiltshire)
  • Ashleworth Ham (Gloucestershire)
  • Somerset Levels & Moors (Somerset)
  • Portdown Meadows (Wiltshire)

Habitat Loss1

Has largely been due to agricultural intensification and associated drainage.

Associated Species1

Mammals

  • Otter
  • Water Vole
  • Water Shrew

Birds

  • Teal
  • Golden Plover
  • Lapwing
  • Black-tailed Godwit
  • Redshank
  • Snipe

Invertebrates

  • Narrow-bordered bee hawk moth
  • Mole Cricket
  • Desmoulin's Snail

Vascular Plants

  • Fen Orchid
  • Three-leaved water crowfoot
  • Cut-Grass
  • Marsh clubmoss
  • Pennyroyal


Current factors affecting the habitat in the SW

  • Agricultural intensification, land drainage and flood defence works leading to loss of habitat and hydrological continuity
  • Industrial and agricultural pollution leading to eutrophication
  • Peat Extraction, loss of soil due to erosion/oxidation
  • Groundwater and surface water abstractions
  • Floodplain development pressures and disturbance
  • Inappropriate ditch management


UK biodiversity objectives and proposed targets

UK Coastal and Floodplain Grazing Marsh Costed Habitat Plan

Maintain the existing habitat extent (300,000 ha) and quality

Rehabilitate 10,000 ha of grazing marsh habitat which has become too dry, or is intensively managed, by the year 2000. Half of this within specified ESAs (Somerset Levels and Moors and Avon Valley) and half elsewhere.

Create 2,500 ha of new grazing from arable land in targeted areas, in addition to that which will be achieved by existing ESA schemes, with the aim of completing as much as possible by the year 2000


South-west biodiversity objectives and proposed targets

OBJECTIVE 1

Maintain extent of existing wet grassland and ditch systems

TARGET: ongoing


OBJECTIVE 2

Maintain the ecological quality of exiting wet grassland and ditch systems in core sites

TARGET: ongoing



OBJECTIVE 3

Improve the management of core sites to enhance populations of species of conservation concern.

TARGET: 50% of area by 2000, 75% of area by 2005, 100% of area by 2010.



OBJECTIVE 4

Expand the core resource by rehabilitating degraded habitat and providing corridors between core sites

TARGET: ongoing


OBJECTIVE 5

Secure-appropriate physical and hydrological conditions to support the wetland grassland resource in perpetuity

TARGET: by 2005



OBJECTIVE 6

Secure public support for conservation management work

TARGET: by 1998


Current Action

Approximately 10,500 ha of floodplain and grazing marsh are designated as SSSIs. Most of the larger sites, e.g. Somerset Levels and Moors and the Avon Valley, are potential SACs and/or SPAs. Several sites are SNCIs or CWS and some sites are managed as nature reserves by local authorities and/or voluntary conservation organisations such as the RSPB, Wildlife Trusts, and the Wildfowl and Wetland Trust.

MAFF's ESA scheme covers the Somerset Levels and Moors and the Avon Valley sites. These two ESAs are complemented by Countryside Stewardship Schemes across the region and EN's Wildlife Enhancement Scheme.

A framework for resolving conflicting water management objectives on important sites has recently been initiated with the production of Water Level Management Plans (WLMP). EN and the Drainage Authorities are working together to complete WLMP for the most important sites in the South West by 1998.

Some sites have been well studied e.g. Somerset Levels and Moors, with ongoing monitoring of bird numbers, botanical interest, aquatic plants and invertebrates. Specialised research projects on the Somerset Levels and Moors on the effects of fertilizers on unimproved meadows, wetland restoration and plant responses to water level management have been carried out and are reviewed annually. Unfortunately most sites do not have the benefit of such detailed studies.

Across the region, bird information is the most comprehensive due to the Wetland Bird Survey.#

Some restoration work is already ongoing in the region e.g. creation of raised water level areas within ESA (Somerset Levels and Moors, Avon Valley); implementation of a WLMP on part of Exminster Marshes; and wetland restoration on privately owned land through Countryside Stewardship and Habitat scheme (water fringe option).



Policy and legislation

Influence national/regional policies on flood defence land use and water resources ('97-'05/ongoing)
LEAD: EA, LAs, MAFF
PARTNERS: EN, NGOs


Management


Ensure all core sites are recognised on all strategic plans (by 00)
LEAD: EN, WTs
PARTNERS: LOs




Ensure existing core sites are recognised on all strategic plans (by '00)
LEAD: LAs
PARTNERS: EN



Ensure ELMs (ESA, CS, WES) are available within all core sites and ditch systems (by '00)
LEAD: MAFF
PARTNERS: EN


Secure positive conservation management on core sites (50% by 2000) (75% by 2005) (100% by 2015)
LEAD: EN, EA, MAFF, IDBs
PARTNER: WTs, FWAG, LOs


Where appropriate, continue programme of reserve acquisition (ongoing)
LEAD: NGOs
PARTNERS: LAs, EN


Secure appropriate hydrological management for core sites through WLMPs (all SSSIs by 1998), (other core sites by 2000), (5,000 ha of rehabilitated land by 2005)
LEAD: EN, EA, IDBs
PARTNERS: LAs, WT, MAFF


Review abstraction licenses on key sites e.g. Kennet and Wylye (ongoing)
LEAD: EA,
PARTNERS: WUs, ABs


Advisory

Establish guidelines fro integrating wet grassland management into sustainable livestock systems (by 1998)
LEAD: MAFF, EN
PARTNERS: FWAG, RIs, LOs



Establish four demonstration sites (two best management practices and two showing rehabilitation) (-'05)LEAD: MAFF, EN
PARTNERS: FWAG, RIs, LOs

Research and monitoring

Continue audit to quantify extent of the actual and potential coastal and floodplain grazing marsh resource (-'98)
LEAD EN, WTs
PARTNERS: EA, ERCs, LAs



Identify and prioritise suitable areas for rehabilitation (-00)
LEAD: EA, EN, MAFF
PARTNERS: WTs, IDBs, LOs


Rehabilitate degraded wet grassland through appropriate conservation management (1,00 ha by 2000), (50000 ha by 2005)
LEAD: EN,LOs, MAFF
PARTNERS: EA, IDBs, LOs



Create permanent grassland by reversion of arable leys (250 ha by 2000), (500 ha by 2005)
LEAD: MAFF, LO
PARTNERS: EN



Set up an integrated monitoring programme on four sites in the region and provide effective routes fro disseminating the results (by 2005)
LEAD: EA, RIs, LOs
PARTNERS: EN, MAFF

Education and awareness raising


Produce an annual programme of visitor days for five sites in the region (by 1998)
LEAD: NGOs
PARTNERS: EN, MAFF, LOs


Produce an audit report and summary information for landowners on this habitat every five years by 2000
LEAD: ALL


Benefits

  • Provision of additional flood storage
  • Incentive payments for extensive agriculture
  • New opportunities for tourism and recreation
  • Protection of wetland ecology
  • Landscape enhancement
  • Improvements in water quality.
    Sediment retention from floodwaters reducing siltation of river channels